YikYak: Providence College’s New Public Safety
Generations predating Gen Z frequently express their disdain regarding anonymous social media posting platforms like YikYak, citing that they allow for misinformation to be spread and harmful gossip to ensue. Within the past month, off-campus student homes have been broken into, burglarized–one an armed robbery–and on-campus residents have harbored peepers taking photos in bathrooms, while non-PC students have entered buildings and attempted to enter residences. Rather than hearing news of these events immediately from the Office of Public Safety, students have turned to outlets like YikYak and GroupMe for information. As such, I’ve come to wonder if platforms like YikYak are a saving grace for students when our own Public Safety Department fails again and again to protect and serve.
On Saturday Sept. 23, an off-campus residence was broken into, the first floor door being shattered and various items stolen from the home. Security camera footage recorded the perpetrator, a young adult male in a navy blue hoodie with a gray and black stocking cap; and a gray facial covering over the mouth and nose. At another home, camera footage recorded the same perpetrator wearing a navy blue hoodie, khaki pants, red and black sneakers, and gloves trying door handles on parked cars at 4:38 a.m. Within a two hour time span, students from nearly every off-campus street shared security footage of the same man trying the door handles of parked cars. One student even shared footage of the same perpetrator from Sept. 3. All this information and more was shared in the PC Class of 2024 GroupMe while word of it was being passed around on YikYak as well. What was shared by Providence College Office of Public Safety on Sept. 23 was the below statement:
Please be advised that Providence College (PC) students have reported to The Providence Police Department (PPD) and the Office of Public Safety, that on Saturday, September 23 unknown person(s) attempted to gain access into residences in the adjacent neighborhood. PPD is further investigating the incidents, and we are continuing to work with Providence Police on this matter.
If you have any information, please contact the Office of Public Safety at 401-865-2391 or Providence Police at 401-272-3121.
No known suspect description was reported.
I take issue with two prominent parts of this report: (1) that students were not notified of the reports during the time in which they occurred, leaving them ignorant of threats to their well-being and (2) that there was reportedly no known suspect description when in fact footage was shared with the PPD and the Office of Public Safety. My one question is: how can students stay safe when they do not know there is an immediate threat to them, and when the Office of Public Safety decides to report on it, they provide no description of perpetrators?
This issue can be traced back years. I recall one Friday night in the fall of 2021 when users on YikYak were posting about an alleged kidnapping attempt of a student who was walking with her boyfriend. Luckily, the boyfriend was able to fend off the attacker and prevent further harm. That same night, a stabbing was alleged on YikYak. While police cars and public safety vehicles lined Eaton Street, shutting down access to campus via the Eaton Street gate, no FriarAlert notification was sent. After the event had occurred and been investigated, an email was finally sent to students. How is it that the FriarAlert system can send flood warnings but cannot send possible threat or reported altercation notifications?
Instead of receiving information from authorities, students are left to scroll through YikYak and group chats on apps like GroupMe to hear about neighborhood threats and suspicious activity when the department hired with the intention of maintaining public safety “only sends stuff if major events happen and have been happening for several months,” as Anna Carlson ’24 remarked. Still more concerning is sophomore Shane Brennan’s report that “a friend of [his] was almost stabbed and nothing was reported. As much as there’s crap on YikYak, at least it’s more accurate and informative than Public Safety.”
It speaks volumes that students feel the need to consult otherwise discreditable sources for information about protecting themselves when the department entrusted with their protection time and time again fails to communicate possible threats, accurate descriptions of the suspects and perpetrators, and refuses to improve upon crime prevention. Perhaps I am just a clanging gong, but my intention with this piece is not to purely complain but to offer constructive criticism. It is my belief that the Office of Public Safety and school officials should seek to mirror other colleges and universities who have adapted their alert systems to include all information reported to authorities regardless of if the case has yet been closed. If Providence College truly seeks to maintain a safe campus for all, then it will need to humbly address the issues of public safety on and off campus, not just sweep it under the rug to maintain a spotless image for benefactors and prospective students.
The Great Ticket War: From Friars Basketball to the Eras Tour
As the new school year kicks off, many Providence College students are already looking ahead to the upcoming basketball season. Unfortunately, acquiring student tickets is getting more difficult with the heightened excitement surrounding the team’s recent successes.
After the season ticket lottery over the summer, there were many students, even seniors, left without season tickets. While the email sent out stated that single-game tickets would be available, the current situation echoes the chaos that occurred when millions tried to get a presale code for The Eras Tour.
Despite only recent spikes in popularity, the Friars have succeeded in previous seasons before the ones within recent memory. Taylor Swift has also consistently shattered records in past years, which proves that this year something else is playing a role in the exceptional demand for live events.
Raffles and random selections make us feel important. When you get an email containing a presale code, it separates you from the crowd. Access to live events is becoming a form of privilege. Even if the tickets are out of budget, people feel obligated to purchase, especially after waiting in a queue for hours. The feeling of desperation overwhelms us until a confirmation email arrives in our inbox.
Potentially, after a few years in lockdown, people feel that the opportunity to attend crowded events could be ripped away at a moment’s notice. No matter the reason, this year has made one thing clear: it’s time for new ways to allocate tickets. College sporting events and popular tours are going to need different strategies.
The College could implement a policy that increases the number of season tickets available to students by reducing the number of games included. While students might not get to experience every game, it would create a more inclusive system that ensures more students have an opportunity to attend. Additionally, having nights designated for each graduation year would also create an exciting approach that more evenly distributes tickets.
While the policies for tours would be different, many of the same principles apply. With social media users boasting about attending multiple tour dates, it is time for policies and systems that prevent individuals from purchasing tickets after already experiencing a show.
This policy could also solve another major problem with largetours: ticket scalping. With resellers charging over double face value, concerts are becoming economically inaccessible for many in the middle class.
Purchasing tickets should not be stressful and disappointing, but without changes, the overwhelming demand for tickets will continue to plague all live events.
Save the Grand Fennell Oak
PC Community Unites to Speak Out Against the College’s Plans to Cut Down Historic Campus Tree
With the demolition of Fennell Hall expected to start this summer for the School of Nursing and Health Sciences, the school plans to cut down the over 150-year-old Grand Fennell Oak to make room for this building. Immediately, faculty from all disciplines, as well as students and families, began demonstrating their frustration and opposition to these plans. A student-created change.org petition has since been published online, asking for the College to rethink this decision. Amassing over 600 signatures in the first three days alone and over 1,000 in the first week, the petition has received great support from our campus community, proving how much the red oak is valued by our community members. From a monetary perspective, The Grand Fennell Oak is appraised at over $44,000, according to the tree asset value listed on the 2022 Providence College Tree Inventory and Management Plan. However, it’s clear that this tree has a significantly greater inherent, historic, and personal value to members of the Providence College community.
Many petition supporters have brought up the environmental importance of trees, explaining that trees are important habitats for insect species, as well as important for air and stormwater filtration, as Jill Parrett, Director of Environmental Health and Safety, explains. Trees play an integral role in removing pollution from our air, converting it into clean, breathable oxygen. She also mentions that trees have the added benefit of alleviating stress and improving mental health. In addition, Parrett states that “mature trees with large canopies also provide a respite from the urban heat islands we live in.” Multiple comments on the petition similarly address how trees will be essential in helping us cope with increased temperatures due to climate change. As carbon dioxide concentrations continue to rise due to our reliance on fossil fuels, we will need trees to remove these pollutants from our atmosphere via photosynthesis. However, if we carelessly cut down trees, we threaten our planet and our very existence. It is especially important to protect large trees like the Grand Fennell Oak, as larger trees are much more effective at removing atmospheric pollutants than small trees.
Additionally, native trees play an essential role in our ecosystem. As Providence College cuts down native trees and replaces them with non-native species, this will threaten the biodiversity we have on campus. For example, Audubon explains that scientists have determined that oak trees are home to more than 550 moth and butterfly species. This means that oaks are not only vital to the survival of these insects, but organisms that rely on caterpillars, moths, and butterflies as food. Audubon adds that in contrast, the ginkgo tree, a non-native species, supports just five species. We need to prioritize preserving these valuable tree species and keeping our campus a natural environment where nature and biodiversity can flourish.
Others add that it is our responsibility to protect Creation and serve as stewards of our environment as highlighted in Pope Francis’ encyclical, Laudato Sí: On the Care of Our Common Home. Dr. Lynette Boos from the Mathematics and Computer Science Department emphasizes that we have “been entrusted with an irreplaceable resource for current and future students, and it is our responsibility to be careful stewards and not do anything short-sighted because it seems convenient.” Dr. Joe Cammarano of the Political Science Department similarly adds that these decisions cannot be based on short-term economic gain; rather, they must focus on and prioritize our long-term stewardship of our Earth. When the School of Nursing and Health Sciences opens, Providence College will undeniably grow economically; however, we cannot ignore the long-term consequences of these actions which would endanger the preservation of nature for future generations, he explains.
In his encyclical, Pope Francis highlights that we need to stop treating nature as a resource to be manipulated and exploited to our advantage. To cut down the Grand Fennell Oak would be in direct opposition to the words of Pope Francis. In his encyclical, he explains, “Each year sees the disappearance of thousands of plant and animal species which we will never know, which our children will never see, because they have been lost forever. The great majority become extinct for reasons related to human activity. Because of us, thousands of species will no longer give glory to God by their very existence, nor convey their message to us. We have no such right.” Cutting down the Grand Fennell Oak only perpetuates this trend of human destruction which the Pope is trying to warn us about. We have no right to carelessly destroy and rid our planet of its biodiversity. To do so would be to violate God’s Creation. Dr. Sandra Keating from the Department of Theology echoes this idea, explaining that the Grand Fennell Oak “does not belong to us; it belongs to the order of Creation. These are the types of decisions that have contributed to our current environmental issues.”
As explained in Laudato Sí, we owe it to future generations to preserve and protect plants, animals, and our environment. Providence College Alumni have explained similar sentiments. Beth Ferland ’94 talks about how she has multiple family members that have attended Providence College, all walking on the same grounds as the Grand Fennell Oak. “My dad walked by this tree, many of my uncles, myself, my husband, and now my daughter,” she says. “Looking forward to the future hoping my grandchildren will enjoy the tree and think of their parents, grandparents, and great grandparents who were witnesses to this grand tree.” Choosing to cut down this tree would erase an important part of history for many alumni, students, and faculty.
Professors also have strong memories associated with the tree. Judd Schiffman of the Art Department, for example, has used the Grand Fennell Oak as a source of inspiration in his ceramics classes. He explains that in the studio, students have been making sculptures to place at the base of its trunk and honor the tree. Schiffman adds that he makes a point to walk underneath the Grand Fennell Oak when he travels from the studio to the art gallery in Smith Center for the Arts, explaining that “it creates an abundance of shade and feels like a wild, natural space in the midst of a very well-groomed and cared for campus.”
Dr. Boos, whose office is in Howley Hall, also has a strong connection to the red oak. Since her first day at Providence College, she has been “in awe of this tree,” something she continues to feel every morning when she walks into her office. Parrett adds that during her field work across campus, she loves observing the tree change from season to season, whether it’s watching the leaves change color or counting bird nests.
Current students have also expressed their deep, personal connections with the Grand Fennell Oak. Lily Alessandro ’24 has lived in Fennell Hall since her freshman year. Although she is sad about the demolition of the building, she hopes that the tree can remain and “coexist” as our campus continues to grow. She explains that she chose to live in Fennell Hall because of its “closeness to nature.” Alessandro appreciates the naturalness of lower campus and this tree specifically, as much of the environment on campus is carefully pruned and landscaped. As a Catholic, she explains that the Grand Fennell Oak serves as a reminder of the beauty and mystery of nature, as well as God’s creativity and love for Creation.
Another PC student, Sarah Klema ’23, lived in Fennell Hall during the pandemic, explaining that during this isolating time, the Grand Fennell Oak, which stood right outside her window, helped her feel less alone. She states that each day, “it became routine to greet the tree before entering [her] dorm, or to stand under its presence in a moment of contemplation when coming back from a walk.” She felt protected underneath its canopy, during a time in which she needed this comfort.
The only question that remains is what can we, as students, faculty, families, and alumni, do to save this historic tree? Dr. Tuba Agartan of the Health Sciences Department explains that sustainability needs to be prioritized more at Providence College, specifically by incorporating sustainability initiatives into the College’s strategic plan and courses. From a student level, one of the best things we can do is speak out and express our opinions. Student support and advocacy has been imperative in implementing some of the most impactful sustainability changes on campus. From composting to reusable to-go boxes, these are successful initiatives that were brought up and proposed by students. By expressing our opposition to the destruction of the Grand Fennell Oak, students can play a critical role in saving this tree.
The Grand Fennell Oak existed long before Providence College was established. It would be careless to cut it down and lose such an important part of history and our ecosystem. As Dr. Keating explains, “At a Catholic College, we should be an example of commitment to protect Creation, not to destroy what is in our way.”
Ryan Incubator Launches in School of Business
Thanks to a $2 million gift from the family of Donald Ryan ’69, Providence College has launched the Ryan Incubator for Entrepreneurship in the Arts and Sciences. Not only will the Incubator be a physical space for presentations and collaboration, but also a network of alumni who will coach and mentor entrepreneurial-minded students. This endeavor is not limited to just business school students; rather, it plans to serve any students who wish to pursue their entrepreneurial ideas.
Kelly Ramirez, co-founder of Social Enterprise Greenhouse, a Providence-based nonprofit incubator which supports local entrepreneurs, leads the project’s development. She began this role in late September and is also an adjunct professor in the business school.
“The incubator is a work in progress,” Ramirez says. “I’ve definitely been listening and learning from students and faculty to know what’s needed. But we are launching a couple of things.”
The Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fellowship launches this summer as part of the Incubator, which will place students with startups in the local community, pair them with alumni coaches, and provide a series of workshops along with a $4,000 stipend. In the fall, Ramirez plans to host a bootcamp/pitch competition for students who have already started or are interested in starting their own businesses.
Also, the incubator advises the entrepreneurship club on campus as well as creates partnerships in the community to support local businesses, particularly in Smith Hill. Ramirez is working closely with the business and innovation minor and says, “The goal is to have more entrepreneurial-related courses in the longer run.”
Daniel Carrero ’23, a philosophy major, works with Ramirez and plays a part in the Incubator’s development. “Historically,” he says, “there seems to be this big split between the business school and Arts & Sciences. It almost feels like you go to two different schools. But the wonderful thing about entrepreneurship—the wonderful thing about the incubator as a vehicle for entrepreneurship—is it can bridge the gap.” Carrero emphasizes how “a lot of creativity is needed for startups” and entrepreneurs need to “use both sides of the brain.”
The Incubator website will soon feature profiles of alumni. “There’s a lot of great lessons, feedback, knowledge, and resources that will be tangible, concrete tools for students in the upcoming months,” Carrero says.
Caroline Craig ’24 is the philanthropic social chair and operations secretary of PC’s Entrepreneurship Society. “The Incubator is an amazing opportunity for students in the business school to learn about entrepreneurship by having the opportunity to use new technologies and work with peers,” she says.
“With any good entrepreneurial venture, the incubator will continue to listen and learn from its primary customers, PC students, to learn where we should go in the future,” Ramirez says. She encourages all students interested in entrepreneurship, whether that means starting one’s own business or having an entrepreneurial mindset in one’s career, to reach out to her.
ECOPC Kicks Off Earth Week with Eaton Street Clean-up and Clean Plate Challenge
In the week leading up to their annual Earth Day celebration on Saturday, April 22, ECOPC hosted a variety of different events, including their Eaton Street Clean-up and Clean Plate Challenge. For the clean-up, the club recruited eight volunteers to pick up litter on the yards, driveways, and sidewalks along Eaton Street. Supplies such as trash bags and gloves were provided by The 02908 Club, who typically send out their own clean-up crew after weekend parties.
The volunteers spent about one hour picking up litter, primarily cans and bottles, staying away from the significant amount of broken glass that littered the street. They plan to host another clean-up with Bio Society, this time at a beach, to close out their Earth Week festivities.
One volunteer expressed her frustration with the blatant disrespect for the property and the community. “What was surprising to me was how it wasn’t just littering and single-use drinks, but it was also clearly deliberate destruction of property…like a TV, or the fact that people put bottles and cans right under people’s tires.” Many volunteers were similarly disgusted by the sheer amount of trash, especially the shattered TV they came across on the sidewalk and the trash going down the drains.
Another volunteer brought up the apparent lack of concern students have for cleaning up after themselves. “What was really disturbing to me was the parking lots between the houses. They were completely covered in cans, bottles, and other trash. There had to have been thousands that no one had the courtesy or care to pick up. I found it really striking, but I think it’s an unfortunate reflection of the culture at PC, and how we don’t value sustainability as much as we should.”
“My thoughts were more like, wow, people can’t walk their dogs here because of all the glass,” another volunteer said. “It’s not safe anymore because of their littering.” Another added, “It’s disrespectful to people who live and drive on the roads regularly that aren’t just seniors.”
Aside from the clean-up, ECOPC also held their second Clean Plate Challenge of the year in Raymond Dining Hall this Tuesday from 4–8 p.m., where they measured students’ leftovers before they were thrown away or composted. Approximately 162 pounds of food scraps were measured by the club during this short four hour period, about 2.5 times more waste than their last event in the fall.
Through this challenge, ECOPC hopes to raise awareness about food waste, and how it’s easy for students to decrease their waste by taking smaller portions. However, many students expressed frustration towards the dining hall’s large portion sizes given at stations that are not self-serve. This is a concern that Sodexo is currently addressing with their staff.
In addition, on Thursday, ECOPC hosted a worms and dirt dessert table in Ray. They hope to see a large turnout at their Earth Day celebration this Saturday, as well as improve environmental awareness on campus through their events.
Letter to the Editor
To the editors:
On Sunday, Feb. 19, Campus Ministry sent its weekly campus-wide email in which it announces upcoming events. One event in particular caught my interest, namely, Emily Albrecht’s talk on Mar 14, “Considering Abortion in a Post-Roe World.” As part of their description of the talk, Campus Ministry writes, “Emily will move beyond slogans to help you base your position on abortion in facts and strong philosophical arguments and will share her own conclusions.” Such wording implies that the talk is educational and that Ms. Albrecht is an expert with formal philosophical credentials, someone who is qualified to deliver a talk on abortion that is not superficial or merely political. The truth, however, is that Ms. Albrecht has no such qualifications or expertise. She works for the Equal Rights Institute, a political organization that coaches pro-life advocates on how to debate their opponents. In her bio for the organization, Ms. Albrecht shares that she holds a B.M. in vocal music education.
Campus Ministry’s description of their event is at best misleading and at worst dishonest. Campus Ministry is, of course, free to invite whomever it pleases to campus to speak on whichever topics it sees fit given the work of that office. But in advertising such events, Campus Ministry ought to remember that Providence College is first and foremost—that is to say, essentially—an institution of higher education (some might disagree and claim that PC is essentially Catholic, but nothing can be essentially Catholic, a point that is easy to see when one remembers that nothing can be born Catholic). Because we are essentially an institution of higher education, Campus Ministry has a responsibility to be honest and forthright with our community about the events it hosts, particularly when those events are presented as educational.
Christopher Arroyo, Ph.D.
Professor of Philosophy